Mayhem at Middlebury College

Updated: Feb. 6, 2025

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or of the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Students at Middlebury College in Vermont turned their backs to Charles Murray, whom they called a white nationalist, during his lecture on March 2, 2017 | Source: Lisa Rathke

Introduction

In March 2017, hundreds of students at Middlebury College in Vermont disrupted an event with Charles Murray, a political scientist and controversial speaker whom some considered a white supremacist. The protest escalated into a violent confrontation that left faculty member Allison Stanger injured. 

This incident became one of the highest-profile examples of student protesters shouting down a speaker with whom they disagreed, setting a precedent for similar events. Immediately, the chaotic scene drew criticism from conservatives, who condemned the students as intolerant, accusing them of engaging in mob mentality and stifling free speech. 

In 1994, Murray co-authored “The Bell Curve,” a book that links lower socioeconomic status to race and intelligence. The book sparked intense debate and has been widely criticized for overemphasizing genetic explanations for intelligence and socioeconomic status while downplaying environmental, social, and historical factors. Even today, the book remains a contentious topic in discussions about race, intelligence, and policy.

Source: CBC

The Role of Free Speech

Point / Counterpoint

What is the role of discipline in this case? What was Middlebury, as an institution, claiming to support? What are the principles behind the faculty and student point of view?

Discussion Questions

  1. What really went wrong at Middlebury College? Could the college faculty and administration have handled Murray’s visit differently? What was the underlying cause of the unseemly violence and how could it have been avoided?
  2. On the same night, a controversial and contested speaker appeared at another small liberal arts institution, Franklin & Marshall College in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Why did that visit go more smoothly?
  3. How are we to understand the similar incidents, documented in the Free Speech Tracker, at Lewis & Clark College in Portland, Oregon, and Claremont McKenna College in Claremont, California? Could the students at these schools have achieved their goals more effectively using different tactics?
  4. The conventional wisdom is that such disruptions almost always involve a liberal shutdown of conservative speech. But there are two examples here of just the opposite. Is it equally offensive that a Jesuit speaker was prevented from talking at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., because of his views? And that a Princeton professor’s commencement address at the University of California, San Diego, had to be canceled after she received death threats when her comments at Hampshire College in Massachusetts were circulated in cell phone videos?
  5. How can U.S. colleges and universities restore civility to such conversations?
  6. How can we understand this conflict in light of today’s campus protests around the Israel-Hamas war? How have university and student responses to controversial speakers or sensitive debate topics changed over time?
  7. Do you think the campus climate surrounding controversial speakers has improved or worsened overall? Why?

Activity

Click on these themes below: Violence/Threats + Hate Speech + Identity

Discuss: What does this confluence of stories with these filters tell us about Free Speech issues and race in the United States? Free Speech and violence?

Tracker Entries

Themes

Categories