National Security
Although the days depicted in Steven Spielberg’s film “The Post” — with a war in Vietnam, an embattled White House, and the classified Pentagon Papers — are long gone, the government continues to claim it has an interest in keeping certain secret material from the public eye. Massive online leaks, such as the one undertaken by Edward Snowden, a former CIA employee and intelligence analyst, have led to the discovery of civilian surveillance programs orchestrated by the National Security Agency. Meanwhile, former President Barack Obama used the power of the executive to prosecute more leakers under the Espionage Act than all previous presidents taken together, highlighting the tension between the country’s interest in keeping the homeland secure and the public’s right to know how its business is being conducted.
Reflection Questions
- Are the lessons of the Pentagon Papers case still relevant today?
- Is it reasonable for the federal government to seek a prior restraint on the unauthorized publication of classified national security information?
- Or are attempts to control, or even influence, what the media do in this arena futile in the digital era?
Context
- When Free Speech and National Security Are at Odds
The Atlantic (Aug. 24, 2018) - Behind the Race to Publish the Top-Secret Pentagon Papers
The New York Times (Dec. 20, 2017)